New and Young Driver
KSI Explained
For many years, young and new drivers have been considered
to be the most vulnerable group to get themselves involved in serious and fatal
road traffic collisions, not just in the UK, but the world over. As this is
backed up statistically, then this point is never in dispute. However, the
motoring world is full of myth and one such myth relating to new drivers is
that they were only trained to ‘pass the driving test’ and not taught how to
actually ‘drive’. A myth that I hope to expose as a misinterpretation of the
facts and eventually lay to rest.
Based on these beliefs, changes have been made to the
driving test in an attempt to reduce casualty rates. It seems to have had
little or no positive effect, as the collision risk presented by young drivers
is still significantly higher and out of proportion with the rest of the
motoring community. The reason for this is simple; our belief in motoring myth
and legend is causing the road safety community to misinterpret statistics and
as a result, misguide road safety initiatives for young and new drivers.
Young drivers in the UK today are taught to very high
standards, certainly still amongst the best in the world. Irrespective of this,
the belief seems to be that a young novice driver, when released onto the road,
is not driving to a good standard. Indeed, the statistics clearly show that a
new driver’s involvement in collisions is as much as 5 times the amount of some
other groups. So it is easy to understand why and how this myth has developed.
What is indoctrinated within the
driving instructors’ community is that instructors are entrusted to teach our
novice drivers to become safe and responsible motorists and any that instructor
teaching a novice just to ‘pass the driving test’ is not worth their salt. Even
on the driving test, any number of eventualities may occur that the novice has
never encountered before, which only a good quality level of training will
enable the novice to evaluate and negotiate safely. To train as an approved
driving instructor, you have to take three exams which include: a knowledge
test, an advanced driving test of a higher standard than any offered to members
of the public and finally a test of instructional ability. The tests are
designed to ensure that the instructor has attained the highest standards of
motoring knowledge and driving ability and then has the instructional skills to
transfer this knowledge to their pupils. It is the instructor’s duty to get his
or her pupils as close to that standard of ‘advanced driving’ as possible and
provide the pupil with all of the skills and safeguards they need to survive
the perils of modern motoring.
Once the pupil is ready for the
road, then the examination takes place, where the novice is tested by
professional and highly-trained driving examiners on their ability to drive. It
is the examiners’ duty to ensure that the novice is fully equipped to deal with
demands of modern motoring - a duty not taken lightly as the lives of many
people depend on the examiners’ judgement. At the point the novice passed their
driving test, they were deemed to be safe and responsible motorists.
The reality for most is that the
day they passed their driving test, they would probably have attained a level
of motoring that would prove to be the best they would ever be; the safest and
closest to an advanced standard that they were ever likely to achieve. However,
as we are beginning to understand, this standard doesn’t seem to last and the
rapid descent to become amongst the most dangerous group of motorists on the
road ensues. So the question is:
What happened that turned our
potentially safest group of motorists into our most dangerous?
It is clear that the learning and
testing process in not at fault.
The current belief is that when a novice motorist is
released onto the road, they immediately present a high risk and only over time,
as they gain experience, do they become safer drivers. This is nothing more
than myth and misunderstanding. In reality, young and new drivers took to the
roads as safe and competent drivers, but for many it is at this point where
things start to go catastrophically wrong. Almost immediately they start to
under-go a period of a re-education of their driving skills. The main reasons
for this change are: choice, peer pressure, influence or just plain bad advice,
but they all too often result in life changing and potentially fatal consequences
for the young and inexperienced driver. It is the combination of this
re-education combined with inexperience that sends their collision risk
soaring. Many decide to make very few changes and as a result their collision
risk remains low. These motorists are, in effect, doing what was always
intended and advised, by adding experience to a good basic standard and solid
foundations.
The following chart has been
created to demonstrate the changes the novice makes to their driving. The left
hand column shows areas tested on the novice driving test, in which the novice
has achieved a competent standard. However, the right hand column displays the
areas where the novice has re-educated themselves and the primary reason for
their dramatic rise in collision risk.
|
Voluntary
Changes Made to the Novices Driving Standard
|
|
|
Good
standard achieved in novice driving test in the following areas
|
Common
changes made to novice test standard
|
|
Eyesight
|
Often deteriorates without being
corrected
|
|
Highway Code
|
Level of knowledge not retained and
new rules not learned
|
|
Controlled Stop
|
Not practised so driver unaware of
vehicle braking ability, however ABS is of great help.
|
|
Reverse Left
|
Often performed in inappropriate
places, at speed and with too few observations.
|
|
Reverse Right
|
As reverse left
|
|
Reverse Park
|
Generally performed at appropriate
speed, lacking observations.
|
|
Turn In Road
|
Performed in unsuitable locations, at
speed and too few observations.
|
|
Control
|
|
|
accelerator
|
Too harsh
|
|
clutch
|
Harsh, covered, coasting
|
|
gears
|
Rushed, inappropriate timing,
incorrect selection
|
|
footbrake
|
Harsh, late
|
|
parking
brake
|
Button not pressed in before
activation
|
|
steering
|
Crossing of hands, hands incorrectly
positioned on wheel, steering with one hand for long periods, steering with
knees
|
|
Move off
|
|
|
safely
|
Observations weak, blind spot not
covered
|
|
controlled
|
At speed, roll back on hills
|
|
Mirrors
|
|
|
signalling
|
Too late, too early or not at all.
|
|
change
direction
|
Too late, too early or not at all.
|
|
change
speed
|
Too late, too early or not at all.
|
|
Signals
|
|
|
necessary
|
Often never given when needed
|
|
correctly
|
If given usually correct, sometimes
forget to cancel.
|
|
timed
|
Too early or late if at all.
|
|
Clearance/obstructions
|
Too fast and too close
|
|
Response to signals
|
|
|
traffic
signs
|
Often missed due to weakened
observations
|
|
road
markings
|
Often missed due to weakened
observations
|
|
traffic
lights
|
Try to beat lights, amber gambler,
totally disregarded
|
|
traffic
controllers
|
Develop disregard due to erosion of driver
qualities
|
|
other
road users
|
Poor interaction with other road
users due to poor attitudes, awareness, concentration, impatience.
|
|
Use of speed
|
Excessive, inappropriate
|
|
Following distance
|
Too close
|
|
Progress
|
|
|
appropriate
speed
|
Failing to keep up with traffic flow
|
|
undue
hesitation
|
Annoys other with hesitation
|
|
Junctions
|
|
|
approach
speed
|
Too fast
|
|
observation
|
Weak
|
|
turning
right
|
Position
|
|
turning
left
|
Position
|
|
cutting
corners
|
Often
|
|
Judgement
|
|
|
overtaking
|
Incorrect method - not PSLMSM
(Position – Speed – Look – Mirror – Signal – Manoeuvre). Poorly judged,
unnecessary
|
|
meeting
|
Lack of courtesy, failing to read
actions of other road users.
|
|
crossing
|
Poor judgement, awareness,
anticipation
|
|
Positioning
|
|
|
normal
driving
|
Not keeping left of centre,
|
|
lane
discipline
|
Not driving in centre of lane, not
moving back into the left when safe.
|
|
Pedestrian crossings
|
Fail to anticipate pedestrian ready
to cross, fail to understand pedestrian right of way.
|
|
Position / normal stops
|
Fail to select safe and appropriate
place to stop. Position by kerb. Wheels correctly aligned.
|
|
Awareness / planning
|
Dealing with things as they happen
and not thinking ahead.
|
|
Ancillary controls
|
Spend too much time looking at in-car
entertainment, Bluetooth, mirrors, phones etc.
|
The answer was simple, it’s
nothing to do with the driving test and everything to do with the changes
novices make after they pass. The story is much the same for all of us, as it
has always been. The day we passed our test, we started to change the way we
drive. The safeguards that the instructor had put in place, to keep the new
driver safe on the road, were being removed one by one, and there are hundreds
of them. Observations weaken, mirror work reduces, speeds increase, hands cross
on the steering wheel, acceleration and breaking harshen and indications lessen,
to name but a few. It’s not just the psychomotor skills that suffer, but also
the cognitive. As their concentration and awareness reduces, they are less able
to react to the hazards surrounding them. As a result, their group collision
risk elevates. Their risk didn’t start high, but raises beyond that of most, if
not all, other motoring groups because of the adaptions they are making.
Eventually, as experience of these new techniques (bad habits) finally kicks
in, their collision risk lowers to that of the average driver.
All of these young drivers
initially had a very good, very safe motoring technique and a very low
collision risk. For whatever reasons, be it outside influence, peer pressure or
choice, their level of safety on the road deteriorated. The best standard most
young drivers will ever achieve is the one they had the day they passed their
test.
Too many young and new drivers
are developing a flawed driving technique before adding experience. If young
drivers can be persuaded to base their experience on solid foundations, then
their collision risk will remain low.
Many of the changes they make can
be graded in terms of safety. For instance, crossing hands on a steering wheel
is far less a risk than a poor overtaking technique. The mirror signal
manoeuvre routine is another technique that often gets dismissed and yet it is
so important to sustain our levels of awareness. By encouraging our young
motorists to retain the most important of these skills, their collision risk (and
therefore the numbers of KSI within this group) would drop like a stone. In my
opinion, the most important set of skills include awareness and anticipation,
concentration, hazard recognition, overtaking and the MSM routine - all
qualities that are in a ‘good drivers’ make-up. These are a mix of psychomotor
skills that support the cognitive. Improvements in these areas alone would
produce significant reductions in casualty rates.
To achieve significant reductions
in young driver casualties, the magic bullet has to be preventing them from
making these basic changes to their driving styles, or at least the most
important of them. They already have knowledge, they just need to be made aware
of the process they are going through, and be persuaded from making the changes
they are all too often eager to make.
Before I finish, take a second
look at the chart, not only does it represent the direction that our young and
new motorists are heading in, it also represents the place where millions of
our motorists have already arrived. Maybe this dispels another myth, where most
of our motorists consider themselves to be good or excellent drivers, yet they
admit that they probably wouldn’t be able to pass the basic driving test, if
they needed to do so again.
End
No comments:
Post a Comment